1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 18, 2014, the network C (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) driven by a driver of the Datoba (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) on or around 21:30 on February 18, 2014, while driving a road in front of the F-do, which is located in E when permanent residence, with a creative vibration sloped from the west-distance room, in order to overtake the HH truck (hereinafter “Defendant”) driven by the above G, the vehicle was driven along the opposite lane beyond the center line of the yellow yellow light lines and turn to the left at the F-side distance intersection where there is no signal apparatus of the Defendant vehicle, and the left part of the left part of the Defendant vehicle was handed down by the part of the Defendant vehicle with the right hand of the Plaintiff Otoba.

Plaintiff

Otoba received a wall in the opposite lane due to the shock, and the deceased died due to an acute hiverosis.

(hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. The Plaintiffs are the parents of the Deceased, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant Vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, 11 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the accident of this case did not temporarily stop to the stop line while making a left turn, and did not turn to the left turn, and the left turn turn turn to the left turn was caused by the collision with the plaintiff Ortoba, who was driven by the deceased, due to the mistake of left turn without the front left turn, so the defendant is liable to compensate the deceased and the plaintiffs for the damages suffered by the deceased by the accident of this case.

B. As a driver who lawfully turns to the left at the left, it is common that the other party to the vehicle following the vehicle at the rear side trust to drive the vehicle according to the flow of the vehicle. There is no duty of care to expect the other party to overtake the Defendant vehicle beyond the center line of yellow-ray, even when the other party attempts to overtake the Defendant vehicle.

The above facts of recognition are found.