1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to A vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is a mutual aid business entity who entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to B vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. On April 24, 2015, at around 19:00, the Defendant’s vehicle turned two lanes near the Jinmun-dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Seoul Special Metropolitan City”) from the flood slope to the shooting distance of the South Line Park, and then entered the non-protective left-hand turn at the flood slope from the flood slope at the flood of the flood slope, and then entered the intersection as a lawsuit, the collision occurred between the Plaintiff’s left-hand side of the vehicle and the front criminal of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was directly located on the side of the flood slope of the south Line, in which one-way passage is permitted from the flood slope of the natural park where one-way passage is allowed from the flood slope of the other.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The instant accident place is an intersection between the two-lanes and the three-lanes crossing between the two-lanes, and the two-lanes and the two-lanes are attached to one-way roads where one-way passage is allowed, and soundproof walls are installed depending on the boundary between the above roads and the side roads except for the above intersections.

On the other hand, side roads are located at a place lower than the roads, and in the vicinity of the above intersection, the direction of the plaintiff's vehicle's running is facing the slope.

On May 15, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 789,900 as repair expenses.

[Ground of Recognition] Unstrifed Facts, Gap evidence 1, 2, 4 through 6 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence 1 through 4 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserts that the accident of this case occurred due to the negligence on the whole part of the defendant vehicle, which caused negligence on the front side, such as taking hand-on conversations while making a left-hand turn in a unreasonable manner, and against this, the defendant is the opposite lane in making a left-hand turn.