logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.04.10 2018고정142
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution as a special larceny in the support to the head of Suwon Fagwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 29, 2016.

1. On June 1, 2015, the Defendant reported on the victim’s proxy purchase by accessing the Internet NeneB’s website and accessing the victim’s website, and made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant deposits the purchase price to be paid in lieu of the right to termination of the successful bid” with the victim’s contact.

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, he did not have an intention or ability to purchase the right to use the successful bid in lieu of the right to use the successful bid.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 239,370 won from the Korean bank account (Account Number C) in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

2. On June 21, 2015, the Defendant reported the purport of “sale of S2 gallons upon galloning” posted on the Internet server and on the national website, and made a false statement to the effect that “on deposit with the victim D who contacted, will send the goods.”

However, even if the defendant receives the price from the injured party, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to sell S2 gallon when galloning.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 35,000 won from the Korean bank account (Account Number C) of the same day from the victim, and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

3. On July 16, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would sell three tickets to 75,000 won,” by visiting the Internet Internet server and the national website to the victim E, and by contacting the victim to the effect that “the Defendant would sell three tickets to 75,00 won,” which was written by the victim E.

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to sell three copies of admission tickets in the future.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and is on the same day from the victim.

arrow