The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment does not have any favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, his mistake is divided, and the amount of damage caused by the crime is relatively small.

However, each thief committed by a criminal defendant cannot be deemed to have committed a theft of property by infringing on another person's dwelling or vehicles, and the nature of the crime is not very good, and the frequency of the crime or the amount of damage is also less.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions in the record, including the above circumstances, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.