1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,548,387 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 6% per annum from November 29, 2019 to February 14, 2020, and the following.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is operating a low temperature warehouse as a stock company established for the purpose of grain, straw, shoulder, miscellaneous grain, bankruptcy, and any incidental business related thereto.

B. On August 5, 2018, the Plaintiff received an order from the Defendant for purchase of the Republic of Korea 404 Gato-ri 404 Gato-ri (1 Mapo-ri 35 km) in Korea (hereinafter “instant Doto-ri”) and stored in a low temperature warehouse. On August 5, 2018, the Plaintiff released the instant Doto-ri from the low temperature warehouse and delivered it to the Defendant.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Part of Evidence A Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the claim for the storage expenses of a low temperature warehouse

A. The plaintiff alleged that the plaintiff operated a low temperature warehouse and stored agricultural products upon receiving an order, and the customer's shipment summary

If there is an agency, the agricultural products kept in return for the price of the ordered agricultural products and the storage expenses, etc. until they are shipped out.

around August 2017, the Plaintiff received an order from the Defendant to purchase the instant Doto Ri and stored the instant Doto Ri in a low temperature warehouse from around that time. On August 5, 2018, the Plaintiff released the instant Doto Ri from a low temperature warehouse and delivered it to the Defendant.

The Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the sum of the storage cost of the low temperature storage cost of 11 million won per month of the Dogri in November of the instant case, and the damages for delay.

B. On August 5, 2018, the Plaintiff: (a) delivered the instant provincial warehouse to the Defendant after shipping the instant provincial warehouse at low temperature; (b) there is no dispute between the parties as to the fact that the low temperature storage cost of the instant provincial warehouse at low temperature; and (c) the Defendant agreed to pay the Plaintiff the low temperature storage cost of the instant provincial warehouse from June 20, 2018 until the delivery date.

Meanwhile, in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as seen earlier, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the performance of the obligation to pay the low temperature storage expenses of the instant provincial warehouse around June 20, 2019.