logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.01.23 2017고단4326
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On October 15, 2017, the Defendant driven B K7 cars under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.150% in blood alcohol content on the road near the restaurant where the name in the Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., is unknown, from around the restaurant where it is impossible to identify the name in the same Gu-free Dong to the vicinity of the apartment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence of traffic accidents, a survey report on actual condition, a report on the detection of a primary driver, and a statement on the circumstances of a primary driver;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include the high level of alcohol content among the blood of this case, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act, the violation of the Road Traffic Act, the violation of the Road Traffic Act, the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the suspension of execution of imprisonment due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the violation of the Road Traffic Accidents Act in 2014, the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. Accordingly, this three drinking driving is the third drinking driver, and the Defendant sold the automobiles on the judgment of driving a drinking immediately after the instant case to other persons.

arrow