logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원경주지원 2014.12.23 2014가단11829
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 13,33,33, Plaintiff B, C, and D, respectively, and each of them from March 18, 2014.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant is a company that had the unfit construction work for an apartment newly constructed in F at the time of racing. The non-party G (hereinafter "the deceased") is employed by the defendant and worked as an assistant to the deceased at the above construction site. The plaintiff A is the deceased's spouse, the plaintiff B, C, and D. The deceased's children.

B. 1) From around 07:00 on March 18, 2014, the Deceased commenced funeral work on the 7th floor of the above apartment complex, 4 U.S., 1 another U.S. assistant factory belonging to the Defendant company, and 7th floor of the above apartment complex. 2) The Deceased et al. started funeral work on the elevator entrance of the 7th floor of the above apartment complex before the Deceased et al. started funeral work. However, there were two safe crossings with the steel pipe, as seen below, but the U.S. M. dismantled dismantled dismantled for the U.S. funeral work.

On the other hand, at the time of the occurrence of the instant accident, there was no safety control network to prevent the falling of the crew inside the elevator.

3) On March 18, 2014, at around 11:30, 2014, 4 U.S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S

2. Determination

A. Even if the defendant does not comply with the related Acts and subordinate statutes such as the Occupational Safety and Health Act, he/she has a duty to take safety measures to install safety devices at the place of work so that his/her employees do not have safety accidents while working.

However, according to the above facts, the work site where the deceased was employed at the time of the occurrence of the accident in this case was dissipated, and there was no stable network.

On the other hand, the deceased or the plaintiffs caused the instant accident.

arrow