Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On November 10, 2015, the Defendant ever worked in the first place with the victim D (V, 46 years of age) who festedly worked while drinking and drinking at a restaurant located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On November 10, 2015, at around 22:30, the Defendant discovered a victim who gets married in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, and walked along the way to walk. The Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim by means of dancing one-time alcohol of the victim himself/herself. In this case, the Defendant removed the bicycle correction device installed by the victim from the Defendant and installed at the same place, and then dismissed the bicycle correction device.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 298 of the Selection of Punishment Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. In full view of various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, family environment, social ties, criminal record and risk of recidivism, profits and preventive effects expected due to the instant disclosure order and notification order, disadvantages and side effects, etc., there are special circumstances in which the Defendant’s personal information may not be disclosed or notified.

The Defendant alleged that the Defendant was in a state of mental or physical loss or mental weakness by drinking alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime. As such, it is recognized that the Defendant was in a state of drinking alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime, but it is recognized that the Defendant was in a state of drinking alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime.