beta
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
Costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).
1. As to the Defendants’ grounds of appeal, the lower court acknowledged the fact that the deceased M entered into a private donation contract with the Plaintiff on June 16, 2011 by comprehensively taking account of the adopted evidence, and determined that the Defendants, as the inheritors of the deceased, are liable to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership based on private donation with respect to each of the inheritance shares in the instant real estate, and rejected the Defendants’ defense that the private donation contract was forged on June 16, 201.
In light of the relevant legal principles and records, such determination by the court below is just, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules,
2. Plaintiff’s ground of appeal
A. As to the ground of appeal No. 1, the lower court did not exchange the deceased with the Defendants for a period of 60 years since the deceased left the sar.
The Plaintiff determined that the exercise of the Defendants’ right to forced inheritance cannot be deemed as going against the good faith principle on the sole basis of the circumstances alleged by the Plaintiff, including that the net W or Defendants did not contributed to forming and managing each of the instant real estate
In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the judgment of the court below is just, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of law by misapprehending the legal principles as to the limitation on the exercise
B. As to the ground of appeal No. 2, the lower court: (a) it is difficult for the Plaintiff to obtain a loan from the Plaintiff, a non-profit corporation, by purchasing each of the instant real estate from AM on May 10, 201; and (b) completed the registration of ownership transfer under a trust in the name of the deceased, who is the representative of the Plaintiff; and (c) the Plaintiff was ancillary on June 1