(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.27 2014나54679

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.27 2014나54679

구상금

Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, KRW 4,560,00 in the judgment, and 5% per annum from June 11, 2013 to January 27, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an association established with a person holding a private taxi transport business license in Seoul Special Metropolitan City as its member, and is engaged in the business of compensating for the damages to the Plaintiff in accordance with the provisions and terms and conditions of the instant standing conference in cases where a member of the instant standing club owned, used, or managed a vehicle (referring to a personal bodily accident) caused by an accident during his/her possession, use, or management of the vehicle. A is the owner of a private taxi (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and is the Plaintiff’s member of the instant standing club.

B. The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to C general taxis (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

C. At around 01:30 on May 1, 2013, the Defendant’s vehicle, along the two-lanes on the left side of the road (on the left side of the Ethical elementary school) along the two-lanes on the two-lane road (on the left side of the Ethical road) of the Plaintiff’s vehicle passing the sond distance into the front part of the front part of the Defendant vehicle (on the front side of the Plaintiff’s seat, the front part of the driver’s seat in the front part of the Defendant vehicle passing through the sond two-lane road (on the front side of the five-lane road) depending on the direction of the Defendant’s vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). A signal light is installed on the instant shooting distance, but the traffic control was not conducted as the yellow flickering light, etc. was operated at the time of the instant accident.

If the situation at the time of the accident in this case is shown in a picture, it shall be as shown in the attached Form.

Me1 Vehicles are Defendant Vehicles, and Me2 Vehicles are Plaintiff Vehicles.

The Plaintiff’s compensation of KRW 7,600,000 for the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle destroyed by the instant accident to A on June 10, 2013 (hereinafter “instant compensation”), and the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2021.01.15 2019나65193

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.29 2016가단81865

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.16 2014나8812

-서울남부지방법원 2019.08.16 2018나67754