beta
Text
1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. 원고의 주장 원고는, 피고가 2012. 9. 20. 충주시장에게 ‘원고가 결혼중개업의 관리에 관한 법률을 위반하였다’는 내용의 공문을 보낸 적이 없음에도 사후에 그와 같은 공문을 위조하여 발송한 것처럼 꾸몄다는 취지의 주장을 하면서, 위 공문 발송 사실의 부존재확인을 구하고 있다.
2. Determination
A. Ex officio, sending an official document with the above contents is merely a notification within an administrative agency, and it does not directly change the legal status of the Plaintiff and other related persons. Thus, it does not constitute an administrative disposition that is subject to appeal litigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 9Du1113, Sept. 8, 200).
In addition, the existence of the dispatch of official document itself does not directly and specifically affect the plaintiff's rights and duties or legal interests, so there is no benefit to seek confirmation.
C. Therefore, the instant lawsuit is dismissed as it appears to be a single mother or is unlawful.