logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.08.22 2019구합5421
도시계획시설사업 실시계획 인가 고시 재결 처분 취소 청구의 소
Text

1. The main lawsuit of this case and the intermediate confirmation lawsuit of this case are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be the principal lawsuit and the intermediate confirmation lawsuit.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 20, 2008, D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) started the construction project of the urban planning road F, G, H, I, and I (hereinafter “instant project”) around that time with conditional consent from the Defendant on the project implementer designation and implementation plan for the city planning road (hereinafter “instant road”) according to the construction of a factory of Yangsan-si Ewon, Yangsan-si, an urban planning facility project.

B. On June 16, 2011, the Defendant’s Intervenor was authorized by the Defendant to revise the implementation plan for the Gyeyang Urban Planning Facility Project, which changed the project implementer of the instant project from D to the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

(J.C. of Gyeyang City).

On April 1, 2016, the Intervenor entered into a comprehensive acquisition agreement with K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “K”) on April 1, 2016 with the content that the Intervenor joining the Defendant comprehensively transferred the instant business rights to K.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant comprehensive acquisition agreement”) D.

On June 28, 2018, the Defendant filed an application with the Defendant for approval of an implementation plan for urban planning facility projects to extend the implementation period due to the delay of the instant project, and the Defendant filed an application for approval of the implementation plan for urban planning facility projects with the Defendant on July 26, 2018, which changed the completion period from June 30, 2018 to December 31, 2018, from June 30, 2018 to December 31, 2018, and publicly notified the application.

(Y) On January 10, 2019, upon the application of the Defendant’s Intervenor, the Defendant re-scheduled the amendment of the implementation plan of the urban planning facility project to be changed from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019, and publicly notified.

(M) On June 7, 2019, upon the application of the Defendant’s Intervenor, the Defendant re-scheduled the completion period of the amended project from June 30, 2019 to December 30, 2019.

arrow