logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.10.29 2014고단2721
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around August 7, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “If the Defendant paid KRW 20 million to the representative director of the Company D, he would be able to proceed with the model voucher construction of the apartment construction that is proceeding in the Jeonbuk-si Si, Jeonbuk-gu, Seoul.”

However, the above apartment construction site was in the state where a lien was established at the construction site interrupted due to the bankruptcy of the above company while the construction was being executed in Han River General Construction Co., Ltd. for about about 10 years, and the defendant entered into an agreement on the transfer of business rights with the above company based on the loan approval amounting to 10 billion won received from the above company, but all of the above 10 billion loan approval was found to be false, and the defendant asserts that he would receive an investment amounting to 25 billion won from the F, and all of the false arguments that he did not have the ability to acquire the business right of the above apartment construction from Han River General Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd., and therefore, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to subcontract the model housing construction project even if he received a contract deposit from the victim.

The Defendant received a promissory note worth KRW 20,100,000 from the victim around August 7, 2009.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. Around September 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim G to the effect that “The construction of the old cargo terminal in the Seocho-gu Yang Jae-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul, is proceeding with the construction of the old cargo terminal in the Seocho-gu, Yang Jae-dong, but its expenses are insufficient. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 20 million, he/she shall be reimbursed within one month and at the same time he/she will be entitled to remove the cargo.”

However, in fact, the Korea Cargo Terminal Development Corporation, as the company that continued to do so, enters the legal management, is beyond the claim group of the Korea Bank.

arrow