logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.11 2017고단6658
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant around November 1, 2012, from the “F main point” of the Victim E operation in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, to “personally and rapidly use them.” If the Defendant lends KRW 5 million to another person, it would be repaid within one month without molding.

B. In the 42-time administrative notice, it was false to the effect that the executive officer will receive the land equivalent to KRW 20 billion at the city of Gyeongyangyang, which is in the city of Gyeongyang, from the father of the 42-time administrative notice, and that the land is expected to be expropriated by the State, and thus, the land will be paid with compensation for losses."

However, in fact, the defendant was not an employee of the NIS who passed the administrative notice, and there was no inheritance of the land equivalent to the market price of KRW 20 billion from the Mediation Division, and even if he received the money from the damaged party due to no special property or fixed income, he did not have any intention or ability to make a change on the agreed date.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 50,000 won check from the injured party on the same day on the same day as loan, and received 36,350,000 won in total from around that time to September 24, 2016 by the same method as the attached crime sight table (1) in the same manner as loans in the same manner as 79 times from around September 24, 2016.

2. In addition, on March 26, 2012, the Defendant ordered the victim to take the orders of the two weeks and the owner of the vessel, and made a false statement as if the payment was to be made.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price normally even if he was provided with alcohol, alcohol, etc. from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received, from the injured party, an alcoholic beverage and an alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 1,180,00 in the market price on the same day, from that day, from that time, from that time by March 6, 2015, the Defendant received, from that time, an alcoholic beverage and an alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 90,220,00 in total in the market price of 68 times, such as the previous list of crimes (2) in the same manner.

arrow