logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2019.09.19 2019나41
임금
Text

1. The judgment of remanding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, including the claim changed from the trial before remanding.

Reasons

The scope of this Court’s adjudication against the Defendant, the Plaintiffs sought payment of unpaid annual leave allowance for unused portion during the annual leave of absence in 2011 and the non-contentious amount for dispute pursuant to the wage negotiation agreement in 2012.

The first instance court dismissed all the claims of plaintiffs G and F and the remaining plaintiffs' non-disqualified deposits, and partly accepted the claims of the remaining plaintiffs' non-paid annual leave allowances.

With respect to this, the plaintiffs and the defendant appealed against each part of the judgment against them, and the judgment before remanding the case dismissed each of the claims of the plaintiffs G and the remaining plaintiffs' non-contentious claims, including the modification of the purport of the claim, and partly admitted the appeal against the remaining plaintiffs' non-paid monthly leave allowances claim.

Accordingly, each of the plaintiffs and the defendant appealed. The Supreme Court reversed the part against the plaintiff G, BG, BD, IE, BE, BF, F, BM, and BS (hereinafter "Plaintiff G")'s claim for unpaid annual leave allowance and the part against the defendant's remaining plaintiffs except the plaintiff G, F, BM and BS (hereinafter "the remaining plaintiffs of this case") and remanded this part of the case. The remaining appeals of the plaintiff G et al. and the remaining appeals of the defendant were dismissed.

Therefore, among the plaintiffs' claims, ① the remaining claims except for the part against the plaintiffs among the claims for the unpaid annual leave allowance of Plaintiffs G, F, BM, and BS among the claims for the unpaid annual leave allowance, that is, the above plaintiffs' winning part of the claims was accepted before the remanding part of the above plaintiffs' winning part of the claims for the unpaid annual leave allowance of Plaintiffs BS, and the remaining plaintiffs' remaining claims for the unpaid annual leave allowance were dismissed in entirety.

All of the claims for the unpaid monthly leave allowance and the claims for the unpaid non-contentious amount, and the claims for the unpaid monthly leave allowance of Plaintiffs BG, BD, IE, BE, and BF.

arrow