beta
Text
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
Reasons
On February 2013, the Defendant presented the draft of the facts charged to F, who is the founder of the victimized company and the registered director, at the office of the State EE, located in Mapo-gu Seoul, on February 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “B, as the children of G, G, and G group, has been employed as the Cheongbu as the Cheongbu as the Cheongbu, G, and J group, and has accumulated a close-friendly relationship with K and LA, which is the Chinese power-based Chinese power-based class.” The Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “B, as the children of G, K, and LA, has been employed as the Cheongbu as the Cheongbu group, the Cheongbu group, who is the Chinese power-based group,
However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to import and sell M to the victimized company, even if he received the money from the victimized company, because it was not issued by the above agency, the defendant did not have worked as the Cheong-gun and Security Guards.
Around February 22, 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the damaged company, received KRW 26 million from the victim under the name of expenses, etc. for the MM import right contract, and acquired it by deception.
Judgment
Whether the documents that the defendant received from the Chinese Jin-Sing Republic of China is not issued by the above institution, and whether the defendant had no intention or ability to import and sell M even if he received money from the victimized company.
The defendant presented to F two copies of the document that he received from the Chinese Office of Second Instance, and the answer of the liaison officer of the Chinese Embassy of the Republic of Korea to this point is that there was no fact that the document was issued only for one (1) (43 pages of the evidence record, and there was no mentioning about the rest of one (1) (46 pages of the evidence record.).
However, the above agreement is presented to F by the defendant after the defendant and F met with K, and it is a detailed contract progress plan than that without any particular contents.