The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (2 million won in penalty, order to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours, confiscation) based on the summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because it is too uneasible.

2. The Defendant’s crime of this case requires strict punishment against the Defendant, taking into account the fact that the victims of women who suffered short horses in subway stations have taken bucks and clothes, and the nature of the crime is grave, and the damage has not been recovered.

However, in full view of all the sentencing circumstances that appear in the records and pleadings, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence, etc., when committing the crime of this case, and there is no history of criminal punishment, and the fact that there is no other history of criminal punishment, the lower court’s sentencing is too too unfeasible and unfair.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.