All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal is that each sentence (Defendant A: 3 years of imprisonment and Defendant B: 4 years of imprisonment) declared by the court below to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following: (a) the Defendants made a confession of the crime of this case while committing the crime of this case; (b) some of the damaged articles of habitual larceny appears to be able to return to victims; (c) Defendant B’s philophone (A) was seized by the investigative agency; and (d) Defendants’ family members and branch members wanting to commit the crime of this case; (b) while the crime of habitual larceny of this case was committed in a way that the Defendants planned to commit the crime of larceny and attempted to steals money and valuables, the crime of habitual larceny of this case was committed against the victims; (c) there is no high quality of the crime; (d) the Defendants were sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a limited period of 350,660,000 won and less; and (e) the Defendants were subject to criminal punishment of this case by committing the crime of this case, and (e) the number of times they did not seem to have been subject to criminal punishment for the crime of larceny of this case; and (e) the Defendants were subject to criminal punishment of this case’s imprisonment with prison labor of this case.