1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 20, 1995, the Plaintiff became a member of a stock company B and has been in charge of the facility repair business.

B. On December 20, 1995, the Plaintiff was faced with the truck that had been under repair of the tent piping at the underground parking lot (hereinafter “the instant accident”). As a result, the Plaintiff was under the diagnosis of the “ethical escape from the 1st place of business” No. 3-4, and the “ethical nuclear removal” was implemented on the basis of the diagnosis of the “ethical escape from the click base, the 3-5th day of the 4-5th month.”

However, the plaintiff did not apply for medical care and disability benefits to the defendant with respect to the above injury and disease.

C. On November 11, 1998, the Plaintiff received medical treatment until April 30, 200 with the injury of brain, eleg, eleg, 12th grade 12 (12th grade 12th grade (6th grade 7th grade 7th grade 7th grade 7th grade 2008), leg, and leg: 12th grade 7th grade (12th grade 7th grade 5th grade 7th grade (the remainder of the completion of the national part of the new part of the new part of the new part of the new part of the new part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part of the previous part).

On March 1, 2015, the Plaintiff obtained the approval for medical care with respect to the injury of 3-4 ppuri damage of the Helllle and Yellebrate 3-4 (hereinafter “the third-party accident in this case”) caused by an accident that has come to fall short of the facility repair work in a guest room (hereinafter “the third-party accident in this case”). On March 3, 2015, the Plaintiff was determined by class 13-2 of the disability grade after medical care until August 2, 2016, such as receiving the “aftermathic 3-4 pact and postm removal”.

However, since there is an obstacle of class 12, class 12 in the dominant part due to the occupational accident of the case No. 2, the defendant is due to the occupational accident of the case No. 3.