logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.06.05 2015고정107
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 High Court Decision 107]

1. On April 29, 2014, from around 10:00 to May 22:02, 2014, the Defendant urged the Defendant to pay money lent to E, the father of the victim, at the exclusive parking lot in front of the “D” restaurant operated by the victim B, from around 10:0 to May 6, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the business operation of the victim by force by forcing the customers who want to visit the above restaurant to park, with the word “the exercise of the right of retention.”

[2015 High Court Decision 207]

2. The Defendant interfering with business is a person operating a company with the trade name “G”, and H and I are employees of the said company.

The defendant, who had lent KRW 1550 million to the victim J (45, 500,000,000 to his/her father, is still in a lawsuit.

Around 12:05 on June 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) entered a restaurant for the operation of the victim located in K in Pakistan, and (b) opened the restaurant entrance with a large voice, “I have paid back money to us; (c) I have paid off money promptly; and (d) I have paid off money and paid off money to us; and (d) I have taken a bath to me, “I shall jointly take a bath, and prevented the entrance of the restaurant,” and “I shall not have paid money.”

As a result, the Defendant conspired with H and I to prevent customers from entering the above restaurant, and thereby interfered with the restaurant business of the victim of about 10 minutes.

[2015 High Court Decision 440]

3. The Defendant: (a) lent the amount equivalent to KRW 200 million to L, the father of the victimJ, who operates the “D” restaurant in the case of Pakistan; and (b) did not receive such payment; (c) had the victim J and the mother of the victim J expressed a notice on the victim M in the vicinity of the said restaurant, thereby impairing the honor of the victims.

On May 6, 2014, the Defendant used a road packaging vehicle in front of the restaurant of the aforementioned “D” vehicle.

arrow