logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.10 2017고단1772
강제추행
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was the Defendant’s proposal within the fourth floor D of the building located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around March 27, 2016, around 20:30, around March 27, 2016.

In the introduction of E, the face of the victim F (n, 48 years of age) and the personnel of E was taken by both hands and the victim's face was taken by the victim.

On April 6, 2016, around 22:30, the Defendant sent the Defendant to the subway station platform located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the subway station, where he was waiting to move along with the Defendant, brought the victim to both arms, and got the Defendant under the influence of entering the Defendant.

On July 13, 2016, at around 15:00, the Defendant was driving a string of the string operated by the influoral pharmacy in the name of the Defendant, and the Defendant got off from the Seoul University Hospital located in Jongno-gu Seoul University to the above D to the above D, and she knee of the Defendant.

On July 16, 2016, at around 15:00, the Defendant was faced with the Defendant, who was given an explanation of the victim to work in accordance with the Defendant’s proposal, in the forest warehouse adjacent to the above D office.

around 16:00 on July 19, 2016, the Defendant gave the victim a method of computer operation, etc. to the Defendant’s book, and the victim coming to the Defendant’s book, and the victim is a slide of money.

The term "Egrh and Egrhym" was rhymd with the shoulder of the victim by cutting the victim's arms.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim five times in total.

Judgment

The conviction in a criminal trial should be based on evidence of probative value, which leads a judge to have a conviction that is beyond a reasonable doubt, to the extent that the facts charged are true. Therefore, if the prosecutor’s proof does not sufficiently reach such a degree of conviction, the suspicion of guilt is doubtful.

arrow