The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment does not have the history of criminal punishment exceeding a fine, and the victims suffered injury due to the crime of injury resulting from the present state building and fire prevention are relatively heavy, and the crime of injury resulting from the present state building and fire prevention was agreed with the victim D, but the crime of injury resulting from the present state building and fire was extremely dangerous, which could have been likely to cause serious damage to the lives and property of a large number of people, the defendant prepared in advance and destroyed the main point of this case by shoting gasoline and causing the injury to the victims, and left the scene without making any effort to extinguish fire, and left the scene. The owner of the main point of this case was the owner of the victim of this case, but it was extremely difficult to reach an agreement even though he deposited part of the amount of damage to the victim F, and all the sentencing conditions stated in the arguments, such as the age, character and conduct of the defendant, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., are too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.