(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.14 2017나2615 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.14 2017나2615

물품대금

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Determination on this safety defense

A. The Defendant’s main defense stated in the instant complaint that the Defendant did not pay any balance pursuant to the pledge (Evidence A No. 1; hereinafter “instant pledge”) by stating that the Defendant was “a person who has caused the insolvency due to embezzlement of outstanding money and public funds while working as an employee of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy.” However, the Defendant did not have caused the insolvency due to embezzlement of outstanding money and public funds as above, and the instant lawsuit itself is unlawful in light of the fact that the name of the instant lawsuit is “goods price.”

B. The lawsuit of this case is a claim against the defendant for the remainder under the agreement of this case. It does not constitute a litigation requirement, and there is no other circumstance to deem the lawsuit of this case unlawful, where the case name granted by the court following the receipt of the case does not constitute a litigation requirement.

Therefore, the defendant's defense of the above principal safety is without merit.

2. Judgment on the merits

A. According to the reasoning of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, Gap evidence No. 1 and the purport of the entire pleadings, the plaintiff is a company engaged in meat processing, wholesale retail, and distribution business. The defendant was an employee of the defendant's business division in Gangseo area from June 1, 2006 to December 31, 2007. The plaintiff and the defendant paid KRW 59,50,000 to the plaintiff on December 13, 2008 on the condition that the plaintiff transferred the defendant's business territory and customers, on the condition that the plaintiff transferred the defendant's business territory and customers, the defendant paid KRW 25,00,000 to the plaintiff. The down payment of KRW 17,250,000 among the down payment of KRW 34,50,000,000, the remainder payment of KRW 17,250,000 to the defendant for the following period of June 30, 2009 (the bones).

유사 판례

-대법원 2014.09.04 2013도8623

-의정부지방법원 2015.05.26 2014구합8211

-대구지방법원포항지원 2014.07.11 2013가합40747

-서울행정법원 2019.01.24 2018구합72444 (1)

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.10.15 2020노2361