Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, with respect to Defendant B, it shall be for 2 years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a business owner who operates a sexual traffic business establishment referred to as "Eanma treatment establishment" on the 5 and 6th floor of D ground buildings in Haju-si, and Defendant B is a "brine" under the name of Defendant A when regulating the place of massage treatment as the nominal owner of the place of the instant massage treatment.

The Defendants conspired to operate the instant massage place from November 4, 2013 to July 17, 2014, while engaging in the act of arranging sexual traffic for business purposes by having the female employees in the name of receiving 170,000 to 180,000 won from male customers and having them sexual intercourse with customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of F, G, and H;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Investigation report (a copy of a passbook of deposits in the card sales of the Eanma treatment establishment), investigation report (report on confirmation of the amount of sales in the Eanma treatment establishment) (report on confirmation of the amount of sales in the Eanma treatment establishment), and application of statutes

1. Relevant Articles and 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation Defendant B: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Determination on the sentence that has no basic area (6 months to 1 year and 4 months) (special form of a person) (special form of a person) in the basic area (6 months to 6 months), including the types of sexual traffic crimes subject to 19 years of age or older and the mediation of sexual traffic, etc. (referring to the mediation, etc. of sexual traffic due to the receipt, payment, etc. of business costs) according to the sentencing guidelines based on the grounds for sentencing under Article 2

1. Defendant A’s criminal records, and H, having a de facto marital relationship with the Defendant at the crime place, has already been punished as a fact that he had already operated a sexual traffic establishment, and the Defendant’s principal case disregards the police, and continues to commit illegal sexual traffic even after it has been controlled by the police.