logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.10.15 2014고단1110
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 23:00, at the front park of “C” located in Cheongju-si, U.S. A, the victim D (18 years of age), E (18 years of age), and F (18 years of age) were forced to smoke, and the Defendant’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police officer's statement about G, D, E, and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the suspect photograph and the police difficulty photograph at the time of crime;

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 40 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the same Act (Article 62(1) of the same Act) provides that juveniles who smoke in a park without following the Defendant’s consent even though they got out of the park, and the Defendant again smoked in the park. The Defendant, by tobacco smokeing, she dykes children, and she committed the instant crime. The Defendant committed the instant crime. The Defendant galkings in depth, she was using unreasonable means to carry out 6th degree disabled with inconvenience. In light of the motive of the crime and immediately after the crime, it appears that they did not intend to move the contents of intimidation; there appears to have been no history of criminal punishment imposed on suspension of qualification or heavier punishment; and that the Defendant must support the foreign spouse and her child)

arrow