beta
Text
1. As to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) 8,859,510 and the Plaintiff’s counterclaim from November 11, 2013 to October 8, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On August 26, 2013, the Plaintiff prepared a subcontract agreement with the Defendant regarding the new construction of the instant building C ground (hereinafter “instant building”) in leisure city (hereinafter “instant construction”) (hereinafter “instant construction”).
The defendant shall, at the request of the plaintiff, supply all the construction materials at construction, and the plaintiff shall be responsible for the number of persons necessary for construction and complete the construction.
The plaintiff is responsible for the industrial accident against all employees that occur during the construction, and is not charged with the civil or criminal liability to the defendant.
The construction period: The payment method of personnel expenses from August 26, 2013 to November 10, 2013: the payment shall be 1.3 million won per square year (59 square meters) and the payment shall be made in accordance with the progress of four construction works.
B. On November 5, 2013, the Plaintiff completed the instant construction and delivered the instant building to the Defendant.
C. The Defendant paid to the Plaintiff KRW 5 million on September 4, 2013, KRW 15 million on September 5, 2013, KRW 15 million on September 5, 2013, KRW 10 million on September 17, 2013, KRW 15 million on September 26, 2013, KRW 15 million on September 26, 2013, and KRW 6 million on October 14, 2013.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. We examine the principal lawsuit and counterclaim together.
가. 원고의 기본 공사대금 청구에 관한 판단 ⑴ 약정 공사대금에 관한 판단 ㈎ 앞서 본 바에 의하면, 피고는 특별한 사정이 없는 한 원고에게 이 사건 공사대금 7670만 원(= 130만 원/평 × 59평)에서 원고가 지급받았음을 자인하는 6000만 원을 공제한 1670만 원 및 이에 대한 지연손해금을 지급할 의무가 있다.
㈏ 이에 대하여, 피고는 2013. 8. 26.경 원고와 사이에 이 사건 공사대금에 관하여 6490만 원(= 110만 원/평 × 59평)으로 약정하였다고 주장하나, 이를 인정할 증거가 없으므로[을 제1호증의12(하도급계약서 중 ‘LEGO: 110萬 원’ 부분은 갑 제1호증의 기재, 을 제1호증의12의 각 나머지 기재에 변론...