All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that each punishment (for four months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of violence treatment lectures) against the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendants reflects the Defendants’ wrong recognition of their mistake, and the Defendants agreed with the victim that they did not want to punish the Defendants, and that they did not have any history of punishment exceeding the fine, etc. are favorable to the Defendants.

Meanwhile, the crime of this case is disadvantageous to the Defendants in light of the content and degree of injury of the Defendants’ use of violence.

Considering the above circumstances and other comprehensively taking account of the Defendants’ age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances after committing a crime, it is difficult to view the lower court’s punishment too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable, considering that there is no change in special circumstances that may be assessed differently from the sentencing conditions of the lower court up to the trial.

Therefore, the above assertion by the Defendants is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendants' appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.