1. The Defendant terminated the consignment management contract on June 4, 2018 with respect to the motor vehicles listed in the attached list to the Plaintiff.

1. If the purport of the entire pleadings is added to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including the virtual number), the plaintiff and the defendant entered the trust management contract (hereinafter "the management contract of this case"). Around March 26, 2001, the plaintiff and the defendant concluded an entrustment management contract with the purport that the plaintiff shall deposit the defendant with the operation and management right of cargo transportation services and the defendant shall entrust the plaintiff with the operation and management right of the cargo transportation services and the plaintiff shall pay 130,000 won per month as management expenses (hereinafter "the management contract of this case"). The plaintiff and the defendant replaced the trad truck, which is the trad truck, a part of the management contract of this case, with the vehicle in the annexed list (hereinafter "the motor vehicle of this case"), and the management contract of this case can be terminated at any time, regardless of the contract term of the management contract of this case, by mixing the elements of the title trust and the delegation.

Therefore, according to the above facts, the management contract of this case was lawfully terminated upon delivery to the defendant on June 4, 2018, in which the copy of the complaint of this case stating the intention of termination of the management contract of this case was stated.

I would like to say.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for registration of transfer of ownership on the instant motor vehicle to the Plaintiff on June 4, 2018 due to the termination of the entrusted management contract.

2. As to this, according to the entrustment management contract for the instant automobile concluded on November 18, 2014 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Defendant paid management expenses by November 17, 2020, when the Plaintiff unilaterally terminates the management contract. Thus, the Plaintiff asserts that the management expenses should be paid to the Defendant. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion cannot be accepted without examining the different issues.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable.