The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the accused is divided into his mistake, that the accused has no criminal record exceeding the fine, and that the accused appears to have been able to have recovered most from the damage caused by the instant crime by agreement with most victims or deposit the amount of damage.

However, considering the fact that the crime of this case is not good, the defendant committed the crime of this case again even though he had the record of sending it to the family court for the same kind of crime, the period of the crime of this case is long, the frequency of the crime is considerable, and the amount of damage is considerable, the balance of sentencing with the same kind of crime, the defendant's age, sexual behavior and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and various conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.