A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 19, 2013, at the D convenience store located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, around 22:50 on November 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) took the F and Si expenses on the ground that F, an employee of the above convenience store, was unreasonable while purchasing E and beer, who was an employee of the company club; and (b) caused F to have a stormed with beer attached to the pole due to beer’s disease located at the place where F, thereby damaging the amount equivalent to KRW 70,00 per market price owned by the G of convenience store.

2. In the time, place, as mentioned in the above paragraph 1 above, the injured Defendant was dissatisfied with the victim F (the age of 18) for the said reasons, and the victim’s head was flicked once due to beer’s disease, and the victim’s face face was blicked twice due to drinking, resulting in injury to the victim, such as an unknown brain, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of damage and destruction of property), the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) shall take into account all the circumstances, including the fact that the defendant led to the crime of this case; although the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim F, the defendant deposited KRW 3,00,000 as part of the amount of damages to the above victim; the defendant did not have any record of punishment for the same crime after around 206; and the defendant

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;