logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.19 2014가합11623
회생채권조사확정재판에 대한 이의
Text

1. The Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2012 Ma4471) dated January 22, 2014 shall revoke the final claim inspection judgment.

2. The plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 26, 2008, the Yeongdeungpo Industrial Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Yol Industrial Development”) entered into a business agreement (hereinafter “instant business agreement”) with the Plaintiff and the Korean Bank (hereinafter “Korea Bank”) to carry out apartment development projects (hereinafter “instant development projects”) on the basis of the operator of Youngdong Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Yandong Construction”) and the operator of the Youngdong Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Yandong Construction Co., Ltd.”) as the operator of the Youngdong Construction Co., Ltd. and the operator of the Kudong Construction Co., Ltd. as the operator of the Youngdong Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Yandong Construction Co., Ltd.”). At the time of Kudong Construction Co., Ltd.’s joint and several liability of the Plaintiff for the loans of KRW 51 billion (hereinafter “instant loan agreement”).

(A) Evidence No. 1). (b)

The loan agreement of this case 1 and 1) On the other hand, as the financial resources of the Yeongdeungpo Industrial Development, which is the executor company, have deteriorated, this case construction company and e-construction company (hereinafter “this case construction”) has aggravated.

(2) On June 24, 2010, the Plaintiff and the Bank entered into an agreement on the transfer of the status of the operator of the instant development project and the assumption of the obligation pursuant to the instant loan agreement with us bank on the part of the operator of the instant development project for the instant development project for the instant development project. Accordingly, the said parties entered into the first amendment agreement with us on the instant loan agreement (Evidence 1. 2) and thereafter, the status of the development project for the instant development project becomes worse, making it impossible for us to properly carry out the instant development project due to the aggravation of the circumstances of the development project, and thus, the instant development project for the instant development project and the instant loan agreement for the purpose of ensuring the smooth progress of the instant development project and the ability to repay loans.

arrow