The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. A favorable circumstance is that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, and that the above victim was not punished by the defendant by mutual agreement with the victim B of obstruction of business.

On the other hand, there are several criminal records of violence against the defendant, and the defendant committed a crime of interference with business after drinking even during the period of suspension of execution due to drinking driving, and the police officers who committed public duties with the uniform during the investigation and commit violence to the police officers who perform public duties and have a high possibility of criticism is disadvantageous.

There is no special relationship or change of circumstances that can be newly considered by this court, and in full view of the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.