beta
Text
1. The defendant,
A. From December 22, 2009 to Plaintiff A, KRW 44,349,160 and its amount
B. Plaintiff B: KRW 5,060,000.
Reasons
1. The premised factual relations are as follows:
On June 22, 2005 between the Defendant and the Access Research Center for Persons with Disabilities (hereinafter referred to as the “Non-Party Corporation”), the Defendant asserted that the Defendant was the Defendant on June 1, 2005 between the subcontract (the supply price of KRW 1.39 million to December 31, 2005; hereinafter referred to as the “instant subcontract”) and the Non-Party Corporation’s insured on July 5, 2005 (the purchase price of KRW 1.3339 billion; hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract guarantee insurance”); the performance guarantee (the purchase price of KRW 319.5 million; hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract guarantee insurance”); the performance guarantee insurance (the purchase price of KRW 300 million; hereinafter referred to as the “instant advance guarantee insurance”); and the performance (the purchase price of KRW 300,500,00; hereinafter referred to as the “instant advance guarantee insurance”); the payment of the insurance money of KRW 3501,500,000,000 for non-Party 39.
Seoul Surety Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant”) issued an order for payment of damages for delay from December 31, 2005 to December 27, 2008, the Seoul Surety Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”) to Non-Party E, the contractor of each of the instant surety Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co.”), the contractor or joint guarantor of each of the instant surety Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”). The Seoul Surety Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) was jointly and severally guaranteed for the instant contract surety, which is KRW 13,974,00,000.
E paid KRW 286,530,974 on April 13, 2007, when the above lawsuit was in progress, to the Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd., and paid KRW 286,530,974 on March 3, 2009, which was about three months after the above judgment became final and conclusive, as this Court Order 2009Gahap23608, and “the Defendant” between the non-party corporation and the non-party corporation on October 6, 2005.