logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019. 09. 26. 선고 2019두43320 판결
(심리불속행) 상여 처분의 적법성 및 부원원가 인정 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court (Cheongju)-2018-Nu-1559 ( October 15, 2019)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho Jae-2017- Daejeon-4093 ( November 22, 2018)

Title

(D) The legality of the bonus disposition and whether the additional cost is recognized

Summary

If a corporation appropriates the cost of processing in the account book, the amount equivalent to the processing cost shall be deemed to have been leaked out of the company, except in extenuating circumstances, and the burden of proving the necessary cost shall be proved by the taxpayer.

Related statutes

Article 19 (Scope of Losses)

Cases

2019du4320 The revocation of the disposition to revoke the notice of change in income amount.

Plaintiff and appellant

】 】

Defendant, Appellant

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

May 15, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

September 26, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Examining the judgment below and the grounds of appeal, since it is apparent that the appellant’s ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow