logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.12.21 2016고단4419
업무방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On March 25, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced by the Suwon District Court to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of interference with business and one year for the same year.

9. 12. The execution of the sentence was completed in the Insified Vocational Training Correctional Institution.

1. At around 10:30 on November 10, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s apartment management work by force by avoiding disturbance, such as neglecting waste, which is managed by the victim D, who is the said apartment security guard, on the front of the 103-dong apartment complex, Ansan-si, an Ansan-si, without any reason, under the influence of alcohol, and taking a separate collection on the front of the 103-dong apartment complex.

2. On November 17, 2016, the Defendant repeated entry into and exit from Ansan-si Group E on several occasions without any justifiable reason, at a discount club for the operation of the victim F, without any justifiable reason. The Defendant, upon receiving a report, posted the victim, employees, and customers a sign at several times, and opened the items posted to make customers account. Even after the police officer returned home from the police officer dispatched, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s marina business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 40 minutes.

3. At around 14:00 on November 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim and customers at the street point in the operation of the victim’s H in front of the apartment building G apartment building in Ansan-si, Ansan-si; (b) expressed the victim’s plastic will to the victim with the larger interest, “Is, spaths, dead, and so on”; and (c) continuously expressed the victim’s plastic will to the victim, and (d) interfered with the victim’s street store business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as spawing the victim’s plastic will by launchinging the victim’s plastic will.

4. On November 27, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s packing horse business by force by following the click slick slick, which had been displayed by the victim J, located in Ansan-si Group I, on the top of the click click, which had oil slicked on the slick slick, and let the employees slick on the hand of the employees.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow