The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged was around 10:00 on November 9, 2017, the Defendant got to a dry field contracted with the victim C, a weekend farm member, from the weekend farm located behind the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and went to the place where the Defendant raised.

In such a case, even though the defendant has a duty of care to prevent the opening of the dog from being opened or to induce the other party to pass first when passing through the opening of the dog, he left the dog with the wind without any measure, and the victim was faced with damage to the standing dog of the above arms which requires treatment for about two weeks, and the victim suffered damage to the standing dog of the above arms which requires treatment for about two weeks.

Accordingly, the Defendant injured the victim by the above negligence.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention: Article 266 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Expression of intention not to punish: Submission of a written agreement on May 2, 2019, which states the victim's intention not to punish the defendant, after the prosecution of this case.

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;