A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for fraud by the Daejeon District Court on April 22, 2003, and on November 24, 2004, he was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime on November 24, 2004 by the same court, and the same kind of power is more than four times.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On December 10, 201, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, at the 2nd restaurant of the D 2nd floor located in the racing C, the F of the headquarters of the Korea Institute of Water Resources (hereinafter “Korea Institute of Water Resources”) was transferred to the victim E; (b) the Defendant, at the construction site of the Hanwon; (c) the Defendant granted the right to operate the restaurant. The Defendant, at the construction site of the Korea Institute of Water Resources (hereinafter “Korea Institute of Water Resources”) that is in progress in the 1655, changed the KRW 20 million from the construction cost of the Korea Institute of Water Resources (hereinafter “Korea Institute of Water Resources”).

However, in fact, the Defendant did not acquire the right to operate the restaurant at the construction site of the Hanwon. Therefore, even if the Defendant received money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to transfer the right to operate the restaurant.

On December 14, 201, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) obtained a total of KRW 2,90,000 from the victim four times in total from the victim, from the victim on December 14, 201; and (c) obtained KRW 10,00,000 from the old house, by taking the burden of KRW 10,00,000,000 from the French land around January 19, 201; and (d) obtained the total of KRW 22,90,00 from the victim on the four occasions, such as the list of crimes, from March 7, 2012.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), concluded a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), had the victim find employment in Hanwon. The F of Hanwon head office transferred the F of Hanwon head office to the Republic of Korea and would have the Plaintiff find employment in Hanwon under the pretext of employment precedent expenses.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to find the victim's children in Korea.

The defendant is against the victim in 2011.