Text
1. The Defendant’s joint office with Gwangju Notaries Public Co., Ltd. for Nonparty C based on an executory letter of notarial deeds No. 2015No. 597.
Reasons
1. On August 26, 2015, the fact that the Defendant executed compulsory execution against the articles listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant articles”) on the basis of an executory deed stating the purport of the claim against Nonparty C on August 26, 2015 is no dispute between the parties.
2. The plaintiff asserts that, since the article of this case is owned by the plaintiff, compulsory execution against the article of this case should not be permitted.
Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 10, the plaintiff may recognize the purchase of articles No. 1, 2, 5, and 6 among the articles in this case on May 6, 2011, 8 articles No. 8 from October 10, 201, articles No. 1, 7 from March 4, 2015, articles No. 14 from February 13, 2015, articles No. 10 from November 16, 2009, No. 11, and 12 from March 2, 2011. The plaintiff's assertion that the articles in this case are owned by the plaintiff cannot be justified because the above articles in this case are no other counter-proof evidence.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.