A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a pastor who operates a family-style church in his/her residence.

On November 7, 2018, the Defendant, at the Seoul Southern Police Station, made the Defendant’s wife B prepare a false complaint to the effect that “The Defendant reported to the police to the effect that he was subject to sexual assault even though he was harsh of the Defendant on June 23, 2018, although he did not have sexual intercourse, he reported to the Defendant to the effect that he was subject to sexual assault.” The Defendant directly signed by the Defendant and submitted a complaint to the police officer whose name is unknown.

However, on June 23, 2018, the Defendant, who was a person with a second degree disability, was allowed to enter his office, and even though C expressed its refusal to refuse, “I do not refuse or refuse”, he was forced to be off his clothes, and was able to see the chest and the sound of the chest in hand, as soon as possible, and C was sexual intercourse by force by inserting it into the sound part of C after the Defendant’s sexual intercourse with C.

Accordingly, the defendant submitted a false complaint to the defendant for the purpose of punishing C.

Summary of Evidence

1. A complaint;

1. Statement to A by the prosecution;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each stenographic record or recording book;

1. Reporting on an investigation (verification of the facts of indictment for detention by the complainant), reporting on internal investigation (verification of the details of the first report), internal investigation (Sms text messages sent by the suspect), reporting on internal investigation (verification of the results of evaluation of msss text messages), internal investigation reports (verification of the results of evaluation of sexual violence response key), investigation reports (the place of the crime submitted by the suspect), investigation reports (information on correspondence permission and monetary analysis reports), investigation reports (report on the conviction of the suspect), and reporting on the contents of telephone conversations with the pastor D

1. Seoul Central District Court Decision 2018 High Court Decision A by Defendant A;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes for the examination of disabilities and each request for appraisal;

1. According to evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act, Article 156 of the Criminal Act, and Article 156 of the Criminal Act, and the argument of the Defendant and his/her defense counsel regarding the criminal facts, the Defendant is a person with a mental disability of Grade II.