1. The Plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased A (EE, Death on April 3, 2016) :

A. Defendant B, 137.

1. The facts stated in the separate sheet of “the cause of claim” as to the cause of claim do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in the separate sheet of evidence Nos. 1 to 5, and evidence Nos. 6-1 to 7, and there is no counter-proof.

Therefore, within the scope of property inherited from the network A, Defendant B, as to KRW 37,79,424 of the loans, and KRW 35,774,970 of the loans, 11% per annum from November 21, 2016 to December 13, 2016, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment, interest on loans, KRW 174,687, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from December 14, 2016 to the day of full payment, Defendant C, and D, as to KRW 25,19,616 of the loans, and KRW 23,84,980 of the loans, shall be paid at the rate of 15% per annum from the next day to December 15, 2016 to the day of full payment, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of KRW 15% per annum 14,165% per annum.

2. As to the Defendants’ assertion, the Defendants asserted that the report on the inheritance limited acceptance was accepted, the following was reduced: (a) the Plaintiff sought the purport of the claim within the scope of the inherited property according to the Defendants’ assertion.

3. According to the conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is accepted on the grounds of merit.