1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion that B has a claim for the amount of compensation such as the amount of subrogated payment under a credit guarantee contract, 201,340,197, 5,060,535, 210,265,689, 3,804,957, 210,265,689, and 201,340,340,197, and the amount of subrogated payment. Since B, who operated his/her business with the trade name of B, transferred his/her business to the defendant, the defendant company is liable to pay the above amount of compensation as the business transferee, or the defendant company is established for the purpose of evading existing debts, and thus, the defendant company is obligated to pay the above amount of compensation by applying the theory of abuse of corporate personality.

2. Determination

A. However, according to the overall purport of evidence No. 4-2, evidence No. 5, evidence No. 1, evidence No. 2, evidence No. 1, evidence No. 2, and evidence No. 2, and evidence No. 4-2, evidence No. 2, and evidence No. 2, evidence No. 4, and evidence No. 2, evidence No. 3, and evidence No. 1, No. 4, No. 3, No. 4, No. 4, No. 1, and No. 1, No. 4, No. 4, No. 1, and No. 2, No. 1, No. 4, No. 4, and No. 1, No. 4, No. 4, and No. 1, No. 1, 2008 were established with the name of E, and No. 1, No. 3, and No. 4, No. 1, 2012.

B. In addition, it is not sufficient to recognize that B and the Defendant Company’s property and business are mixed only with the statement of evidence No. 6, and that B established the Defendant Company in the name of wife D for the purpose of evading obligations, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

3. As such, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed on the ground that it is reasonable.