The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (10 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the accused is recognized that the defendant was involved in committing the crime, and the defendant voluntarily surrenders to the crime and actively cooperates in the investigation of the narcotics offender, and that it is economically difficult for the mentally handicapped and the beneficiary of livelihood benefits to do so.

However, considering the fact that the Defendant had been sentenced three times to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime and one suspended sentence for the same crime, after the execution of the above imprisonment has been completed, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period, and the frequency of medication has not been considerable, and all the sentencing conditions specified in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.