The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. There is no fact that G and I received KRW 1.2 million from G and I as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, it can be sufficiently recognized that “the Defendant received KRW 1.2 million from G and I after receiving an illegal solicitation as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the lower judgment.”

1) On a consistent basis from the investigative agency to this court, G and I have already supplied the G this FF hospital with prus frusium 4 gambling. In order to impose rebates (one gambling) on the Defendant under the name of KRW 300,000,000, G and I have found 24 pages from the cash withdrawal machine on the way in which the FF hospital was located at the time and time stated the above facts constituting the crime, thereby putting them into the envelope. After that, G and I have found the Defendant in the Defendant’s medical room, and thereafter, I stated that “G had given the above envelope to the Defendant.”

2) According to the transaction specification list, G was confirmed to have supplied the F Hospital on September 11, 2012 with the first Pulra flusium 4 gamblings, etc.

In addition, according to the I's statement of transaction, I's statement of deposit passbook, I's statement of investigation agency, etc., the location of the I's house and the J's place of business in the I's place of business in the I's place of business in the above I's place of business on September 12, 2012. On September 12, 2012, in the deposit account in the above I's place of business, 1.2 million won has been withdrawn from the Korean bank in the vicinity of the above F's country, and 4 million won has been additionally withdrawn from the Korean bank

3) Of course, with respect to the first place where G and I first met (whether it is a parking lot before our bank located in F) on the day, the date on which G and I delivered the above envelope to the Defendant (as of September 11, 2012, stamp on September 11, 2012) and specific time (as of September 11, 2012, stamp on 2-4 p.m.) (as of September 2, 2012, stamp on 2-5-6 p.m.), there is a little difference between G and I’s statements at investigative agencies and courts, and there is an incorrect face.