logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.10.07 2016고단3221
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On June 8, 1993, at around 04:00 on June 8, 1993, A, the user of the Defendant, operated B truck loaded with freight exceeding 10 tons during a storage, and violated the road management authority’s restriction on vehicle operation by operating the truck in excess of 10 tons at the control station of the construction department located in the YY-gun, YY-gun.

2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995) which applies to the facts charged in the instant case, "where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits an act of violating Article 84 subparagraph 1 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall be punished by a fine under the relevant Article shall also be imposed on the corporation." This provision applies to the Constitutional Court Decision 2011Hun-Ga24 decided Dec. 29, 201 and Article 47 (3) of the Constitutional Court Act, which shall retroactively lose its effect.

In a case where the penal law or the legal provision becomes retroactively null and void due to the decision of unconstitutionality, the defendant's case which was prosecuted by applying the relevant provision shall be limited to the case where it is not committed.

3. The instant facts charged constitute a crime and thus, the Defendant is acquitted on the basis of the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow