1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

In addition, the Plaintiff is running a petroleum retail business in the course of operating the 5167 Yongsan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City gas station (hereinafter “instant gas station”).

On March 13, 2017, as a result of the inspection of the collection date of sample samples for the name of a selling business establishment, the Gangwon headquarters notified the Defendant on March 23, 2017 of the result of the quality inspection of petroleum products conducted for the instant gas station as follows.

[Inspection sample number 12] On March 28, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the result of the quality inspection of the said petroleum products, and requested the Defendant to re-examine the products by mixing approximately 5% of other petroleum products (such as light oil, etc.) with light oil for automobiles.

On April 17, 2017, the Gangwon Institute Headquarters issued an objection to the quality inspection of petroleum products in the instant gas station.

On April 19, 2017, the Gangwon-gu headquarters notified the Defendant that “The defendant is aware that the applicant has no status of keeping the test samples for storage, and that the test results conducted by the first test subject tester and the other test tester are fake petroleum products in the same manner as the result of the initial test results.”

On May 11, 2017, on the ground that the Defendant violated Article 29(1)1 of the former Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act (amended by Act No. 14774, Apr. 18, 2017; hereinafter “former Petroleum Business Act”), the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the prior disposition ordering the Plaintiff to submit his opinion on the disposition of suspending the business for three months or imposing a penalty surcharge of KRW 100 million pursuant to Articles 13(3)8 and 14(1)3 of the same Act.

The defendant is the plaintiff on July 20, 2017.