logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.05.21 2019가단6182
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the second floor of 182.19 square meters among the buildings listed in the attached list;

B. From May 29, 2018, the same shall apply.

Reasons

1. On January 2018, the Plaintiff, among the buildings listed in the [Attachment List (hereinafter “instant building”), leased KRW 20 million to the Defendant with a deposit of KRW 20 million, the lease period of KRW 3 years, and monthly rent of KRW 1.5 million. The Defendant did not pay deposit of KRW 15 million and monthly rent, and the Plaintiff terminated the lease contract on October 10, 2018.

However, on November 13, 2018, the original defendant paid a deposit of KRW 15 million by November 30, 2018, and entered into a new lease agreement by January 30, 2019, but the defendant did not implement the said obligation to pay overdue rent and deposit.

Nevertheless, since the Defendant delivered only the first floor of the instant building, it sought a return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent from the date of delivery of the second floor and the date of completion of delivery of the second floor. 2. Decision by service by public notice of applicable law (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

arrow