A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 2019, the Defendant used the following: (a) the video call was made in the state with the victim and the body while making the call through the fluorcation of the victim B (V, 38 years of age) and “the fireworks rather than the fireworks”; and (b) used the video call to raise money from the victim.

On February 6, 2020, the Defendant called the victim at around 20:00 and sold the victim’s dial-a-a-be images to the Defendant who had the bareboat female-gu video, but who had it in Thailand, for KRW 30 million.

Sexually related dynamics with widths also have video images.

The payment of KRW 50 million is requested to be made. By the day, I would like to find out how to reduce the money to us.

The victim, from February 8, 2020 to February 25, 2020, hereinafter “crypted,” crypted as “as soon as possible,” to the victim several times.

If we do not know about KRW 50 million, we spread sexually related video images.

The Kakao Stockholm message to the purport that “the victim sent the Defendant’s mobile phone, and the victim cut off the Defendant’s mobile phone, and then sent the victim’s photograph showing the victim’s body by using the mobile phone in the name of the Defendant-friendly C around March 4, 2020, and “A”.

The Republic of Korea telephone call (hereinafter referred to as the “Satch”).

The phrase “the victim” is transmitted, and around that time, contactd with D, the victim’s post-speak, thereby making the victim’s work significantly.

B. I will do so as to be within the meaning of this section.

B. The victim has the body images of the victim.

By means such as “intimidating the victim by intimidationing the victim,” the victim was forced to withdraw KRW 50 million from the damaged person, but the victim was attempted to have the wind that he/she did not comply with.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Personal effects, photographs, etc. of Handphone letters;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (referring to unknown photographs), and a report on investigation (referring to a statement by a reference D phone);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 352 and 350 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Social service order under the Criminal Act;