A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 17, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Cheongju District Court for the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on June 30, 2010, was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Daejeon District Court for the same crimes, etc. on September 24, 2010 during the suspended sentence period, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 24, 2010, and the said suspended sentence becomes void and has a total of four same-time power, including the completion of the execution of each of the said suspended sentence on June 27,

On February 25, 2014, at around 22:28, the Defendant driven Cribe, while under the influence of alcohol, at approximately 1 km section from the front day of the fluoral fluor in the fluore-dong, Kimcheon-si to the front day of the same construction of new facilities in the same city of peace.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (applicable to the same type of power judgment and personal inquiry reports);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. In light of the fact that there are the same records as stated in the reasoning for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders, the crime is committed during the period of repeated crimes, the amount of drinking alcohol is considerably high, and the motive for drinking alcohol driving is not considered, a sentence of sentence is inevitable.

However, in consideration of the fact that there is a dependent and reflects on it, the sentence shall be determined as per the order.