logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.10.28 2015가단24948
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On October 29, 2005, the basic facts were determined to purchase the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) owned by the Defendant from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant real estate”) within KRW 171,00,000, the down payment amount of KRW 17,100,000, and the remainder amount of KRW 5 months from the date of the down payment (hereinafter “instant sales contract”). At that time, the Defendant paid KRW 17,10,000,000 to the Defendant for down payment.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 2 (including provisional number), purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. 1) The Defendant received down payment after concluding the instant sales contract with the Defendant, and received down payment. The Plaintiff’s status based on the instant sales contract was transferred in order to the Plaintiff in order, the Dozp C&C, the Dozp-based Dozp-based Doz-based Round, D, Doz-based Doz-based Doz-based Dop Construction, and the Plaintiff. Therefore, at the same time, the Defendant is obligated to pay the purchase and sale payment from the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff, and at the same time, to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership for the real estate listed in the separate sheet as the instant sales contract on December 31, 2007. (2) Defendant 1 agreed that the instant sales contract was null and void, as it did not pay the remainder by December 31, 2007 with the Defendant. Accordingly, the instant sales contract became null and void, and it waived the said down payment.

② The Plaintiff is not the purchaser of the instant contract, since the status of the obligee was transferred to SPC, and the status of the purchaser was not transferred according to the instant sales contract.

③ Change of the purchaser of the instant sales contract from west L&C to the Plaintiff is null and void as it is based on the title trust agreement, and even if not, it is not so.

arrow