logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.12.23 2014가단14524
가맹비 반환 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On July 5, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a franchise agreement with C, which is an employee of the Defendant Company, and paid KRW 5 million to the franchise. The Plaintiff purchased and run food materials, such as the 18.5 million won of the senior walker’s machinery, among the introduction of C, and supplied to another company without going through the Defendant Company, and operated the business; “D” is recognized by the Plaintiff’s testimony to establish the Defendant Company and registered the G as the representative director in order to operate the franchise business while the F is operating as the representative; and “D” is recognized as either a dispute between the parties or a witness’s testimony.

2. The plaintiff is the cause of the claim in this case. C concluded the above franchise store contract and concluded the above franchise store contract with the false fact that daily sales exceed KRW 10,000,000, and forced the head office to purchase used machinery for the head of Hoba, and did not properly manage the franchise store due to the failure of A/S due to the failure of the head office in Hoba, or the provision of A/S due to the suspension of the head office's dysys and other dysysys and dys and dys and dys and gys and gys and gys and gys and gys and gys and gys and gys and 54,230,000,000 won in total, and five million,000,000 won in total.

3. Gamba, the Defendant Company deceivings the Plaintiff.

There is no evidence to prove that the Defendant forced the purchase of used machines or used machines, and that the repair of used machines did not properly be believed in light of witness H and C’s testimony, but rather, the Plaintiff’s repair appears to be responsible for the Plaintiff. According to the witnessC’s testimony, the Defendant Company’s testimony of the witnessC provided “D’s d’s d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’ d’

arrow